I'm going to say it right off the bat that I didn't find Redskin all that great. Its a good movie with interesting themes and good writing but it just didn't grasp me. The main issue with this movie, and what annoys me sometimes with movies is the Hollywood ending they throw in at the end. Wing Foot gets the girl, the bad guys get arrested/shot, the Indians get rich off oil and Wing Foot gets accepted. Mostly just personal preference but the ending all the same felt too...perfect for lack of a better term.
The subplot (or overarching plot if you like it that way) of advancing a culture by losing some customs or to stay with the old ways was well thought out and was presented probably the best way it could have been. It connected well with Wing Foot's struggle of acceptance and acted as a good backdrop for most of the action. Speaking of action the scene with Wing Foot escaping from the Pueblo people was excellent. It was almost like watching a free running video at times. Also how the writers teased at a Romeo and Juliet plot with the Navajo and the Pueblo people, then deconstructed it with Corn Blossom drinking a bottle of "poison" (hilariously labeled just poison) but then jumping up and running off before anyone could think to check a pulse.
On the mention of subplots, compared to Within Our Gates Redskin manages to keep the subplots clean, easy to understand and even manages to pull them all together in the end.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Thursday, January 21, 2010
First Actual Post - Within Our Gates
Following the viewing of Within our Gates I tried to figure out how exactly I received the movie. Knowing the backstory and with only one screening of the film I'm still struggling to find out how it came out in my mind's eye.
The over arcing plot was interesting, presenting a realistic human drama rather than the fantastic tale Birth of a Nation conveys. Within our Gates shows the troubles of Sylvia, who faces struggles to both her race and her identity within the nation, though this is downplayed until the ending act. The main issue I faced when watching the movie was the abundance of plot lines, some resolved and some unresolved. As someone who wishes to enter screenwriting, it does annoy me when plots become too busy or aren't resolved well. Some of the plots, such as the Larry subplot, did seem unnecessary to me and the unresolved cases of the Landry's son's fate drew attention to this problem. However this is all nitpicking and when compared to modern films Within our Gates still presents a very clear plot line and does well to maintain all the subplots. Also much could be attributed to the missing scenes in the film.
Now when compared to the movie it is directly countering, Birth of a Nation, I saw many elements that made it superior. Within our Gates developed believable characters, all of whom had their faults and vices, and didn't create a clear villain character, besides the short lived Philip Gridlestone. While BOAN made their characters around clear archetypes (ex: the Clan Members as the heroic knight figures) Within our Gates made all the characters presented balanced, with none clearly fitting a clear archetype character, which is extremely rare in cinema to see.
Overall Within our Gates was a interesting film that displayed story telling qualities that in my opinion is hard to see in even contemporary films.
The over arcing plot was interesting, presenting a realistic human drama rather than the fantastic tale Birth of a Nation conveys. Within our Gates shows the troubles of Sylvia, who faces struggles to both her race and her identity within the nation, though this is downplayed until the ending act. The main issue I faced when watching the movie was the abundance of plot lines, some resolved and some unresolved. As someone who wishes to enter screenwriting, it does annoy me when plots become too busy or aren't resolved well. Some of the plots, such as the Larry subplot, did seem unnecessary to me and the unresolved cases of the Landry's son's fate drew attention to this problem. However this is all nitpicking and when compared to modern films Within our Gates still presents a very clear plot line and does well to maintain all the subplots. Also much could be attributed to the missing scenes in the film.
Now when compared to the movie it is directly countering, Birth of a Nation, I saw many elements that made it superior. Within our Gates developed believable characters, all of whom had their faults and vices, and didn't create a clear villain character, besides the short lived Philip Gridlestone. While BOAN made their characters around clear archetypes (ex: the Clan Members as the heroic knight figures) Within our Gates made all the characters presented balanced, with none clearly fitting a clear archetype character, which is extremely rare in cinema to see.
Overall Within our Gates was a interesting film that displayed story telling qualities that in my opinion is hard to see in even contemporary films.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)